Skip to content
SourcrLab
Recruitify logo

Agency ATS and sales CRM with a dedicated GDPR module

Primary sources checked

Recruitify

Recruitify is a modern ATS with an integrated sales CRM, sold in separate packages for internal HR, agencies and freelancers, and enterprise or RPO. Per-user pricing is published, contracting and body-leasing workflows are supported, and consent, expiry and anonymisation get a module of their own.

Visit RecruitifyCompare

The short answer

Best for
A perm, staffing or IT contracting agency that runs a sales pipeline alongside its candidate pipeline and has to answer consent and retention questions
Not ideal for
Very small teams where per-user pricing across a whole desk outweighs the value of the CRM half of the product
Price
Agencies EUR 79/user/month monthly, EUR 64 annual; HR teams EUR 69 monthly, EUR 52 annual
Closest alternative
Recruit CRM logo
Recruit CRMThe comparable agency ATS and CRM with a much larger independent review base, when a proven track record matters more than a dedicated GDPR and anonymisation module.

At a glance

  • Recruitment fitStrong
  • Ease of useUnknown
  • ImplementationUnknown
  • Price transparencyStrong
  • Value for moneyUnknown
  • ScalabilityFair
Why these assessments
Recruitment fitStrong
Candidate, client, contact, sales and contractor databases; perm, staffing, IT contracting and freelancer workflows; blind CV generation; career pages and multiposting. Every object in it exists because agencies need it.
Ease of useUnknown
SourcrLab has not used it. A system carrying both a recruiting pipeline and a sales pipeline asks a lot of one interface, and whether that works is only visible from inside a real desk.
ImplementationUnknown
Migration scope, onboarding and implementation terms were not established. Moving candidate, client and commercial history into a new system of record is the largest cost in this kind of decision and nothing published addresses it.
Price transparencyStrong
Per-user monthly and annual rates are published for both the HR and agency packages, with enterprise on quote. A buyer can multiply seats by rate and know the subscription cost before speaking to anyone.
Value for moneyUnknown
Not assessed. EUR 64 a seat annually billed is competitive for an ATS with a CRM inside it; whether both halves are deep enough to replace what a firm runs today is the question the price cannot answer.
ScalabilityFair
Per-seat pricing scales linearly and predictably with recruiter count, with a separate enterprise, RPO and shared-service package above it. Linear also means no volume relief: a twenty-recruiter agency pays twenty times a five-recruiter one.

Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.

Where it sits

  1. Discover
  2. Contact
  3. Apply
  4. ATS
  5. Hire

The SourcrLab bottom line

A modern ATS with AI and CRM sold in distinct packages for internal HR, recruitment agencies and freelancers, and enterprise, RPO and shared-service centres. The AI layer is practical rather than speculative: CV parser, candidate summary, anonymous CV generator, job-post generator, candidate matching and recommendation, and automation rules, with the vendor's deck also describing Boolean and X-Ray search, a browser extension and dynamic talent lists. The GDPR and anonymisation module is the part most worth attention: a consent centre with expiry handling, renewals and anonymisation, plus retention and consent history and an audit trail on project pages. That is unusual as a first-class module rather than a checkbox, though no formal ISO or SOC certification was established. Pricing is published per user โ€” agencies EUR 79 a month or EUR 64 billed annually, HR teams EUR 69 or EUR 52 โ€” and localised pages may show regional differences, so the canonical English page is what is recorded here rather than a cross-locale mix.

Best fit

An agency whose commercial side and recruiting side keep drifting apart. Recruitify puts candidate, client, contact, sales and contractor databases in one environment with sales opportunities and client lifecycle beside the pipeline, which matters most where the same consultant owns both. The contracting and body-leasing workflows extend that past perm placement, which is where a lot of ATS products stop.

Think twice if

Breadth across three buyer packages is not depth in yours. Internal HR, agency and enterprise or RPO flows are genuinely different jobs, and a platform that serves all three is making a claim in each. Test the specific workflow your desk lives in โ€” perm, contracting, or body leasing โ€” rather than counting modules, and get the migration scope in writing, because that is the number nobody publishes.

SourcrLab assessment

Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.

Why choose Recruitify?

The sales CRM is in the product, not beside it

Candidate, client, contact, sales and contractor databases share one environment, with sales opportunities and client lifecycle alongside the recruiting pipeline. For an agency where consultants sell and deliver, the alternative is reconciling two systems by hand every week.

Contracting and body leasing are supported, not improvised

Perm, staffing, IT contracting and freelancer workflows are all named, with contracting and body-leasing flows in the vendor deck and current RPO content. Agencies that place contractors usually end up bending a perm ATS into shape; this is designed for both.

GDPR handling as a module rather than a promise

A consent centre with expiry handling, renewals and anonymisation, plus retention and consent history and an audit trail. Agencies holding candidate data for years need this to be a working feature, and most systems answer the question with a policy document instead.

Per-user pricing you can multiply out

EUR 79 a user monthly or EUR 64 billed annually for the agency package, against enterprise competitors that quote only. Knowing the subscription cost before a sales call is what lets a smaller agency shortlist this alongside the established names.

Main trade-offs

Three buyer packages, three different jobs

Internal HR, agency and enterprise or RPO flows differ substantially, and a platform serving all three is making a separate promise in each. Test the exact model your desk runs rather than accepting the breadth as evidence of depth in your case.

Per-seat pricing scales with the whole desk

Cost rises directly with recruiter count and no volume relief is published. For a growing agency, a system of record priced per seat is a line that grows every time you hire, which is worth modelling at your two-year headcount rather than today's.

No formal certification, despite the compliance framing

The GDPR and anonymisation module is a real capability and formal ISO or SOC certification was not established. A buyer whose procurement asks for an attestation should ask for one specifically rather than reading the module as the answer.

The integration catalogue is not enumerated

Named integrations were not established from the pages checked. For a system of record that has to sit beside payroll, job boards, assessment tools and contract administration, the connector list is a first-order question and it has no published answer.

Pricing and buying reality

Agencies from EUR 64/user/month billed annually

  • Recruitment Agencies: EUR 79 per user/month billed monthly, EUR 64 per user/month billed annually
  • HR Team: EUR 69 per user/month billed monthly, EUR 52 per user/month billed annually
  • Enterprise: on quote
  • The agency plan is stated to include the HR suite, a comprehensive CRM, unlimited contract, contact, sales and client databases and advanced reporting
  • Localised pricing pages may show regional plan differences; the canonical English page is the source recorded here

What we do not know

  • Minimum seat counts and contract term
  • Migration, onboarding and implementation fees
  • The named integration catalogue
  • Formal ISO or SOC certifications

Checked on the vendor's pricing page, August 2026. English pricing page (per-user monthly and annual rates for HR Team and Recruitment Agencies, enterprise on quote, agency plan inclusions)

How it fits your stack

Works with

  • Career pages and job-board multiposting from inside the system
  • Contracting and body-leasing administration alongside perm placement

Likely replaces

  • A separate sales CRM kept alongside the recruitment ATS
  • Manual consent tracking, expiry chasing and CV anonymisation

May overlap with

  • General CRM platforms used for agency business development

Check before buying

  • Depth in the exact workflow you run โ€” perm, contracting or body leasing
  • Migration scope and fees, which are not published
  • Your required integrations by name, since the catalogue is not published

Recruitify vs alternatives

Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.

Recruit CRM logo
Recruit CRM

Choose Recruit CRM when a large independent review base and a longer track record matter more than a dedicated GDPR and anonymisation module.

Vitae AI logo
Vitae AI

Choose Vitae AI when you want sourcing and outreach inside the same system as the ATS and CRM, and are willing to model credit consumption on top of the seat price.

Spott ATS logo
Spott ATS

Consider Spott for a European agency ATS and CRM when you want a third option in the same bracket before deciding.

Used Recruitify?

Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical โ€” all useful.

Share your experience

Evidence

Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information

Work at Recruitify?

Email us to verify this profile or suggest a factual update.

Claim this profile