Agency recruitment operating system: ATS, CRM, sourcing and outreach
Primary sources checkedVitae AI
Vitae consolidates ATS, CRM, sourcing, outreach, scheduling, careers pages and reporting into one configurable platform at $69 per recruiter a month, with a credit balance metering AI actions and contact-data lookups on top. It publishes an API and MCP surface for connecting your own AI assistant.
The short answer
- Best for
- A modern agency or embedded team that wants one system for candidates, clients, sourcing and sequences, and is willing to model credit consumption rather than only compare seat prices
- Not ideal for
- Teams that need proven depth in one module today: the surface is very broad, and breadth is not the same as maturity in the part you actually live in
- Price
- $69 per recruiter/month with 2,500 credits; Employer $499/month for the team
- Closest alternative
- Recruit CRMThe established agency ATS and CRM with a large independent review base, when a proven system of record matters more than a consolidated feature surface.
At a glance
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Ease of useUnknown
- ImplementationStrong
- Price transparencyFair
- Value for moneyUnknown
- ScalabilityFair
Why these assessments
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Candidate and client ATS and CRM, multi-client workspaces, branded careers sites, sequences across email, LinkedIn and SMS — everything is shaped for agency, executive search, RPO and in-house talent work rather than adapted from sales software.
- Ease of useUnknown
- SourcrLab has not used it. Configurability and daily usability pull against each other in this category, and which side a platform lands on only shows after a desk has worked in it for a month.
- ImplementationStrong
- Free standard migrations are named from Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workable, Loxo, JobAdder, Recruiterflow and Recruit CRM. Naming the systems rather than promising migration in general is what makes that claim checkable before signing.
- Price transparencyFair
- The seat price, the pooled employer price, every add-on and the top-up rate are all published, which is exceptional. What is not knowable in advance is your credit consumption, and that is the half of the bill that varies.
- Value for moneyUnknown
- Not assessed. $69 a seat against a stack of four subscriptions looks decisive on paper, and the credit line is what decides whether it stays that way — so the comparison cannot be settled without a real month of usage.
- ScalabilityFair
- Seats scale linearly and credits scale with usage, which is honest but means the bill grows on two axes at once. Enterprise offers 100,000-plus pooled credits with custom data residency and dedicated infrastructure, so the ceiling exists — it is just not priced publicly.
Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.
Where it sits
- Discover
- Contact
- Outreach
- Apply
- ATS
- Hire
The SourcrLab bottom line
Unusually open about its own commercials: Agency Pro at $69 per recruiter a month with 2,500 credits per seat, Employer at $499 a month for the whole team with 5,000 pooled credits, Enterprise custom and annual with 100,000-plus credits, advanced security and admin, custom data residency and DPA, dedicated infrastructure and 24/7 support. Add-ons and top-ups are priced to the cent, including credits at $0.01 with a 100-credit minimum and twelve-month validity. The stack position is genuinely different in one respect: the site supports connecting Claude or ChatGPT and exposes API and MCP language, which for an agency that wants to build its own automation on top of the system of record is a real technical differentiator if the implementation proves out. Free standard migrations from nine named systems make the switch cost checkable rather than promised.
Best fit
An agency currently paying for an ATS, a CRM, a sourcing tool, a sequencer and a scheduler, and losing time to the seams between them. Vitae's proposition is that those are one system, at a seat price well below the sum of the parts, with multi-client workspaces and branded careers pages that fit an RPO or embedded model rather than a single-employer one.
Think twice if
Model the credits before comparing the seat price to anything. One balance covers AI actions and contact-data lookups, and contact data is where sourcing volume turns into cost — so a heavy sourcing desk and a light one on the same $69 seat will not receive the same invoice. Add-ons stack in the same direction: Find People is $39 a recruiter and Business Development $200 an agency, each carrying their own credit grant.
SourcrLab assessment
Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.
Why choose Vitae AI?
One system where an agency normally runs four
Candidate and client ATS and CRM, people search, outreach sequences across email, LinkedIn and SMS, scheduling, branded careers sites and reporting sit in one platform. At $69 a recruiter that is below what most agencies pay for the ATS alone, before the sourcing and sequencing subscriptions.
Multi-client workspaces fit RPO and embedded work
Multi-client workspaces and branded careers sites are in the Agency Pro tier rather than reserved for enterprise. For an embedded recruiter running three clients at once, that structural separation is the difference between a workable system and a shared inbox with tags.
Bring your own AI, through a documented surface
The site supports connecting Claude or ChatGPT and exposes API and MCP language. An agency that wants to automate around its own data rather than wait for a vendor roadmap has an actual route, which almost nothing else in this category offers.
The migration path is named, not implied
Free standard migrations are listed from Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workable, Loxo, JobAdder, Recruiterflow and Recruit CRM. Switching cost is the largest hidden number in any system-of-record decision, and naming the source systems makes it something a buyer can verify rather than hope for.
Main trade-offs
Credits are the variable half of the bill
One balance covers AI actions and contact-data lookups, and contact-data actions carry specific credit costs. Total cost therefore tracks sourcing and enrichment volume rather than headcount, which makes the published seat price an incomplete comparison against a flat-rate competitor.
Add-ons carry the capabilities you may assume are included
Find People is $39 per recruiter a month and Business Development $200 per agency a month, with a standalone Vitae BD at $99 per user. A desk doing outbound sourcing and business development is not on a $69 seat; it is on $69 plus $39 plus a share of $200.
A very broad surface is not evidence of depth
Consolidating eight products into one is the pitch, and a checklist match is not a quality match. Test the two or three modules your desk actually lives in — usually candidate search, sequences and reporting — rather than valuing the breadth itself.
Comparison tables on a vendor's own site are not independent
Vitae publishes first-party comparisons against established competitors, and no independent review depth was established here. For a system-of-record decision, the absence of a substantial third-party review base is itself worth weighing.
Pricing and buying reality
$69 per recruiter/month, plus credits
- Agency Pro: $69 per recruiter/month with 2,500 credits per seat per month — candidate and client ATS and CRM, custom pipelines, fields and views, email and calendar, AI agent access, sourcing and talent pools, automation and reporting, multi-client workspaces, sequences across email, LinkedIn and SMS, branded careers site, five integrations or custom workflows, migration support
- Employer: $499/month for the whole team with 5,000 pooled credits — full hiring stack, people search, outreach sequences, talent pools, automation, reporting and AI assistant
- Enterprise: custom, annual, 100,000-plus pooled credits, advanced security and admin, custom data residency and DPA, dedicated infrastructure, 24/7 priority support
- Add-ons: Find People +$39 per recruiter/month adding 2,000 credits; Business Development +$200 per agency/month adding 5,000 credits plus signal scanning; standalone Vitae BD $99 per user/month with 2,500 credits
- Top-ups: $0.01 per credit, 100-credit minimum, purchased credits valid 12 months
- Credits meter AI actions and contact-data lookups, so total cost tracks sourcing volume as well as seats
What we do not know
- Credit cost per specific contact-data or AI action
- Typical monthly credit consumption for an active sourcing desk
- Enterprise pricing and minimum seat counts
- Contract term on Agency Pro and Employer
Checked on the vendor's pricing page, August 2026. Pricing page (Agency Pro, Employer and Enterprise tiers with credit grants, add-ons, top-up rate and credit validity)
How it fits your stack
Works with
- Email and calendar, and your own AI assistant through the published API and MCP surface
- Email, LinkedIn and SMS as outreach channels
Likely replaces
- A separate ATS, CRM, sourcing tool, sequencer and scheduler
- A separate careers-site product for an agency or embedded team
May overlap with
- Contact-data providers, since enrichment is metered inside the same credit balance
Check before buying
- Your monthly contact-data and AI action volume, converted into credits
- Whether Find People and Business Development add-ons are needed for your desk
- Depth in the two or three modules your recruiters actually live in
Vitae AI vs alternatives
Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.
Choose Recruit CRM when a proven agency system of record with a large independent review base matters more than the widest consolidated feature surface.
Choose Loxo when sourcing and contact data are the centre of the desk and you would rather buy that depth directly than meter it through a credit balance.
Consider Recruiterflow for an agency operating system with a comparable consolidation story and a longer track record of running agency desks.
Used Vitae AI?
Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical — all useful.
Evidence
- Configurable recruiting platform consolidating ATS, CRM, sourcing, outreach, scheduling, careers pages, reporting and AI automation — checked against a primary source: Vitae product site (Recruitment OS positioning, target segments, consolidation scope, API and MCP language)
- Agency Pro $69 per recruiter/month with 2,500 credits per seat; Employer $499/month for the team with 5,000 pooled credits; Enterprise custom and annual with 100,000-plus credits — checked against a primary source: Pricing page (Agency Pro, Employer and Enterprise tiers with credit grants, add-ons, top-up rate and credit validity)
- Add-ons: Find People +$39 per recruiter/month, Business Development +$200 per agency/month, standalone Vitae BD $99 per user/month; top-ups $0.01 per credit with a 100-credit minimum and 12-month validity — checked against a primary source: Pricing page (Agency Pro, Employer and Enterprise tiers with credit grants, add-ons, top-up rate and credit validity)
- One credit balance covers AI actions, and contact-data actions carry specific credit costs — checked against a primary source: Pricing page (Agency Pro, Employer and Enterprise tiers with credit grants, add-ons, top-up rate and credit validity)
- Free standard migrations named from Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workable, Loxo, JobAdder, Recruiterflow and Recruit CRM — checked against a primary source: One-platform page (named free standard migrations, shared core across tiers, hosting and uptime statements)
- Site supports connecting Claude or ChatGPT and exposes API and MCP language — checked against a primary source: Vitae product site (Recruitment OS positioning, target segments, consolidation scope, API and MCP language)
- Same core, compliance and AI engine across tiers; hosted on Google Cloud with a 99.9% uptime target — vendor claim, not independently verified: One-platform page (named free standard migrations, shared core across tiers, hosting and uptime statements)
- Independent customer review depth; first-party comparison tables are not independent evidence — not enough evidence
- SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work. — not enough evidence
Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information
Work at Vitae AI?
Email us to verify this profile or suggest a factual update.