Skip to content
SourcrLab
All comparisons
Metaview logo

Metaview

55/100

AI note-taker built for recruiting interviews. Automatically generates structured interview notes so recruiters can focus on the conversation.

VS
Avoma logo

Avoma

70/100

Bi-directional ATS sync (Greenhouse, Lever, Workday) drops notes on the candidate record automatically. That's the differentiator.

Metaview vs Avoma

The Verdict
Rating 6.0/10
๐Ÿ†

Our pick

Metaview

Metaview if you want everything tuned to hiring. Avoma if you need broader ATS coverage (Workday especially) and don't mind a more generalist notetaker.

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall
Metaview
Rating 6.0/5
Best value
Avoma
From Starter from $24/user/month, Plus from $59/user/month
Best for specialized needs
Avoma
inhouse

Summary

Both play the ATS-integration card. Metaview is hiring-specific with Ashby/Workable plus Greenhouse and goes deep into interview-structure. Avoma's ATS sync is broader (Workday, Lever) but the notetaker itself is generalist, not recruiting-first.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureMetaviewAvoma
PricingPricing on request(Starting from $30/user/month)Pricing on request(Starting from Starter from $24/user/month, Plus from $59/user/month)
Free PlanNoNo
Free TrialNoYes
Key Features
  • Video interview recording & playback
  • AI-powered interview transcription
  • Structured interview scorecards
  • One-way async video interviews
  • Live video interviews
  • Interview analytics & insights
  • Bi-directional ATS sync (Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, more)
  • AI meeting notes + summaries
  • Conversation intelligence analytics
  • Topic tracking + keyword alerts
  • CRM sync (Salesforce, HubSpot)
  • Custom scorecards
Best For
  • Remote-first companies
  • High-volume hiring
  • Global recruiting teams
  • Hiring managers
  • inhouse
  • agency
Pros
  • Flexible scheduling for candidates
  • Consistent interview evaluation
  • Time savings on initial screening
  • Better candidate comparison
  • Best-in-class ATS integration depth
  • Notes auto-land on candidate profile โ€” no manual copy
  • Conversation analytics useful for interviewer coaching
Cons
  • Some candidates prefer in-person
  • Technical issues can disrupt interviews
  • AI evaluation has limitations for soft skills
  • Transcription and attribution are average, not exceptional
  • No real free tier
  • Feature-heavy โ€” learning curve for small teams

Metaview โ€” Pricing Details

Paid - Starting at $30/user/month

Visit MetaviewVisit Avoma

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections