Is Fellow or Metaview more affordable?

Fellow pricing: Freemium (from Free tier, Pro from $7/user/month, Business from $10/user/month). Metaview pricing: Paid (from $30/user/month). Fellow offers a free plan.

All comparisons

Fellow

70/100

AI notetaker with accurate multi-speaker attribution and admin-governed workspace for candidate-conversation data.

Metaview

55/100

AI note-taker built for recruiting interviews. Automatically generates structured interview notes so recruiters can focus on the conversation.

Fellow vs Metaview

The Verdict

Rating 6.0/10

🏆

Our pick

Metaview

Read the verdict

Fellow for most teams — self-serve, cheap, covers the compliance basics. Metaview when the recruiting function is senior enough to justify enterprise sales cycle and custom integrations.

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall

Metaview

Rating 6.0/5

Best value

Fellow

Free plan available

Best for specialized needs

Fellow

inhouse

Summary

Fellow is a strong generalist notetaker with admin-governed workspace controls; Metaview is purpose-built for recruiting with deeper ATS sync (Greenhouse, Ashby, Workable) and structured interview templates. Fellow wins on price and self-serve adoption; Metaview wins on depth for a dedicated TA function.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Fellow	Metaview
Pricing	Freemium(Starting from Free tier, Pro from $7/user/month, Business from $10/user/month)	Pricing on request(Starting from $30/user/month)
Free Plan	Yes	No
Free Trial	Yes	No
Key Features	Multi-speaker attribution for panel calls Admin-governed workspace for candidate data Configurable retention + deletion policies Agenda templates for structured interviews Action items + follow-up automation Zoom / Google Meet / Teams integration Feedback loops between recruiter and hiring manager	Video interview recording & playback AI-powered interview transcription Structured interview scorecards One-way async video interviews Live video interviews Interview analytics & insights
Best For	inhouse agency enterprise	Remote-first companies High-volume hiring Global recruiting teams Hiring managers
Pros	Accurate speaker attribution in multi-interviewer panels Candidate conversation data lives in an admin-governed workspace Configurable retention + deletion settings for hiring compliance Cheapest entry point among serious notetakers ($7/user)	Flexible scheduling for candidates Consistent interview evaluation Time savings on initial screening Better candidate comparison
Cons	Heavier UI than single-purpose transcribers — more setup Full value lands only when the whole hiring team adopts it Advanced compliance controls gated to Business plan	Some candidates prefer in-person Technical issues can disrupt interviews AI evaluation has limitations for soft skills

Metaview — Pricing Details

Paid - Starting at $30/user/month

Visit Fellow Visit Metaview

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections

⚖️HireVue vs Metaview ⚖️Fellow vs Otter.ai ⚖️Metaview vs BrightHire 🛠️Fellow — Full Review 🛠️Metaview — Full Review 🛠️Fellow Alternatives 🛠️Metaview Alternatives 📋Best Passive Candidate Sourcing Tools for Startups

← View all comparisons