Agency ATS + recruiting CRM
Primary sources checkedLoxo
ATS and recruiting CRM with sourcing and contact data built in, sold per user with a credit allowance for the AI and data work.
The short answer
- Best for
- Agencies and search teams that source as much as they track
- Not ideal for
- Teams that only need tracking — Core is priced above a plain agency ATS
- Price
- From USD 149 per user / month, billed annually and paid up front
- Closest alternative
- Recruit CRMWhen the client and placement side matters more than the sourcing engine, at a lower published price
At a glance
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Ease of useUnknown
- ImplementationFair
- Price transparencyFair
- Value for moneyFair
- ScalabilityFair
Why these assessments
- Recruitment fitStrong
- An agency ATS and recruiting CRM with the sourcing engine and contact data inside the same subscription.
- Ease of useUnknown
- We have not used it, and we found no independent account of consultant-level work in the product.
- ImplementationFair
- Migration is part of the offer and a trial exists, but the plan is annual and paid up front.
- Price transparencyFair
- Core and Professional carry per-user prices; enterprise does not, and the cost of topping up credits is unstated.
- Value for moneyFair
- One subscription instead of an ATS plus a sourcing tool plus a data provider, though the reason to buy it sits on the USD 199 plan.
- ScalabilityFair
- Credits are pooled across the team rather than counted per seat, which helps as the desk grows, but they can run out.
Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.
Where it sits
- Discover
- Contact
- Outreach
- ATS
- Interview
- Hire
The SourcrLab bottom line
The sourcing engine is the product; the ATS is how you keep what it finds. That makes the honest comparison Core-plus-a-sourcing-tool against Professional, not Core against a cheaper ATS. Credits are pooled across the team, which helps, but they are still a second budget line.
Best fit
Recruiting businesses that want the pipeline and the sourcing engine in one subscription, rather than an ATS plus a separate sourcing tool plus a contact data provider.
Think twice if
Teams that only need tracking. Core at $149 per user is priced above plain agency ATS options, and the reason to pay it sits on the Professional plan.
SourcrLab assessment
Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.
Why choose Loxo?
Sourcing and pipeline in one subscription
Professional adds the talent graph, contact information and the agentic features on top of the ATS and CRM, so the find-and-track loop does not span two vendors.
Credits are pooled, not per seat
2,500 credits per user per month pooled across the team means a heavy sourcer and a light one can share one allowance instead of each hitting their own ceiling.
Migration is part of the offer
The vendor includes free migration for Core teams of three seats and up, and self-serve migration tooling below that. Moving an agency database is usually the expensive part.
Main trade-offs
The useful plan is $199 per user
Core at $149 is the ATS and CRM; the talent graph, contact data, AI chat and API sit on Professional at $199 per user per month, billed annually and paid up front.
Annual, paid up front
Both published plans are annual agreements paid in advance. For a five-person desk on Professional that is a five-figure commitment before the first placement.
Credits can be topped up, which means they run out
Boost tiers at two and five times the allowance exist precisely because the base allowance does not always cover a sourcing-heavy month. Model your own volume first.
Pricing and buying reality
From USD 149 per user / month
- Core: USD 149 per user / month, billed annually. ATS, CRM, AI search, pipelines, reporting
- Professional: USD 199 per user / month, billed annually, with 2,500 credits per user per month pooled across the team
- Credit boosts: 2x for 5,000 and 5x for 12,500 credits per user per month
- 7-day free trial of the Professional capabilities. Enterprise is a custom annual agreement
- Free migration for Core teams of 3 seats and up
What we do not know
- The price of the credit boosts
- What Enterprise costs and where it starts
- Talent graph coverage for the Benelux
Checked on the vendor's pricing page, August 2026. Loxo pricing page
How it fits your stack
Works with
- Your mailbox and calendar; API access on Professional
Likely replaces
- A separate sourcing tool next to the ATS
- A contact data subscription, depending on your volume
May overlap with
- hireEZ, SeekOut and contact data providers
Check before buying
- Whether Core plus your current sourcing tool beats Professional
- Credit burn in a normal sourcing month
- Data export terms before migrating in
Loxo vs alternatives
Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.
Choose Recruit CRM if the client and placement side matters more than the sourcing engine, at a lower per-seat price.
Consider Crelate if workflow flexibility matters more than a bundled talent graph.
Consider Bullhorn if you also need timesheets and pay and bill for contract desks.
Loxo head to head
Pairs SourcrLab has looked at as a single buying decision, with the trade-offs written out.
Used Loxo?
Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical — all useful.
Evidence
- Core and Professional prices — checked against a primary source: Loxo pricing page
- Credit allowance and boosts — checked against a primary source: Loxo pricing page
- Trial length and migration offer — checked against a primary source: Loxo pricing page
- Talent graph size — vendor claim, not independently verified: Loxo pricing page
- Enterprise pricing — not enough evidence
- SourcrLab hands-on use — not enough evidence
Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information
Work at Loxo?
Email us to verify this profile or suggest a factual update.