Applicant tracking for in-house teams
Primary sources checkedPinpoint
A UK-built in-house ATS with a strong careers-site story and a large integration list, sold entirely through demos with no published prices.
The short answer
- Best for
- In-house teams in the UK or US hiring steadily enough to justify a sales cycle
- Not ideal for
- Anyone who needs to compare prices before booking a call
- Price
- Quoted only. No figures, no self-serve signup and no free trial are published
- Closest alternative
- HomerunThe same careers-page-led pitch with published European prices you can evaluate without a call
At a glance
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Ease of useUnknown
- ImplementationUnknown
- Price transparencyWeak
- Value for moneyUnknown
- ScalabilityFair
Why these assessments
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Purpose-built in-house applicant tracking: careers sites, applications, pipelines, interview scheduling and reporting.
- Ease of useUnknown
- We have not used it, and with no trial or self-serve signup there is no way to form a view without entering a sales process.
- ImplementationUnknown
- The vendor names implementation support in its sales material but publishes no timeline, scope or cost for it.
- Price transparencyWeak
- No price at any level, no tier names, no unit of pricing and no trial. Every figure comes from a call.
- Value for moneyUnknown
- Cannot be assessed. There is no price to weigh the product against.
- ScalabilityFair
- A named integration list in the hundreds and reporting aimed at talent teams suggest it is built for organisations rather than individuals, but nothing published sets an upper bound.
Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.
Where it sits
- Apply
- Screen
- Interview
- Decision
- Hire
The SourcrLab bottom line
A well-regarded in-house ATS from the UK, positioned around careers sites, candidate experience and reporting rather than raw pipeline mechanics, with an integration list the vendor puts in the hundreds. The commercial model is entirely demo-led: there is no pricing page, no self-serve signup and no trial, so the only way to evaluate it is to enter a sales process. That is a legitimate model for a mid-market product, and it does mean this brief can say nothing credible about cost or value.
Best fit
An in-house talent team that treats the careers site and the candidate experience as part of the product it is buying, and has enough hiring volume to make a sales-led purchase worth the time.
Think twice if
If you want to shortlist on price. Nothing is published: no tiers, no per-user figure, no minimum, no trial. You cannot compare it with a published competitor without booking a demo first.
SourcrLab assessment
Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.
Why choose Pinpoint?
The careers site is the product, not an afterthought
Pinpoint leads with employer brand and candidate experience rather than with pipeline stages. For a team whose problem is attracting applicants rather than organising them, that is the right emphasis.
A large named integration list
The vendor names over a hundred integrations across HRIS, background checking, assessment and job boards. That matters more than feature counts when the ATS has to sit inside an existing HR stack.
Built for in-house teams, not adapted from agency software
The vocabulary, the reporting and the approval flows assume an employer hiring for itself, which avoids the mismatch you get when an agency CRM is sold to an internal team.
Main trade-offs
Nothing about the price is public
Not a starting figure, not a unit, not a minimum contract. Budget planning and shortlisting both require a call, and you will not know whether it is in range until you have spent that time.
No trial and no self-serve signup
You cannot form your own view of the interface before committing to a sales process. For a small team that alone can be enough to look elsewhere.
Implementation is named but never sized
The vendor promises support with setup and migration without publishing how long it takes or whether it is charged. Get both in the contract rather than the pitch.
Pricing and buying reality
Quoted only. No prices are published
- No pricing page, no tier names, no starting figure and no stated pricing unit
- No free plan, no free trial and no self-serve signup: the route to purchase is a booked demo
- The vendor names over 100 integrations across HRIS, background checking, assessment and job boards
- Sold into the UK and US markets
What we do not know
- Any price at all: starting figure, unit and minimum contract
- Whether pricing is per user, per employee or per job
- Whether implementation is charged separately
- Where data is hosted and which transfer safeguards apply
Checked August 2026. We do not list a price we have not verified ourselves. Pinpoint website, checked for a pricing page and self-serve route
How it fits your stack
Works with
- HRIS, background checking, assessment and job board tools, via a named integration list
Likely replaces
- A separate careers site alongside an older ATS
May overlap with
- Homerun and Teamtailor, which sell the same careers-site-led in-house pitch
Check before buying
- The price and its unit, in writing, before investing time in a demo cycle
- Whether implementation and migration are included or quoted separately
- That your HRIS and assessment tools are on the integration list
Pinpoint vs alternatives
Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.
Used Pinpoint?
Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical — all useful.
Evidence
- No prices are published anywhere on the vendor site — checked against a primary source: Pinpoint website, checked for a pricing page and self-serve route
- The purchase route is a booked demo with no self-serve signup — checked against a primary source: Pinpoint website, checked for a pricing page and self-serve route
- Over 100 named integrations — vendor claim, not independently verified: Pinpoint website, checked for a pricing page and self-serve route
- Positioned for in-house teams around careers sites and candidate experience — vendor claim, not independently verified: Pinpoint website, checked for a pricing page and self-serve route
- Any pricing figure, unit or minimum — not enough evidence
- Implementation time and cost — not enough evidence
- SourcrLab hands-on use — not enough evidence
Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information
Work at Pinpoint?
Email us to verify this profile or suggest a factual update.