LinkFinder AI

It is sold to sales teams, not to recruiters

The footer on every page reads "B2B data enrichment API for sales and revenue teams". The plans are named for solo prospectors, sales teams and agencies. Every CRM and outreach destination on the integrations page is a sales CRM, a sequencer or a dialler, and no ATS or recruitment CRM appears at all. Recruitment is named as a permitted use in the Terms; it is not what the product is built around.

Failed lookups are charged

The API documentation states it directly: every request is charged, including lookups where no data is found. A business phone number costs 50 credits whether or not one comes back. In a market the vendor covers thinly, the bill grows fastest exactly where the tool is least useful.

Business contact data only, by policy

The privacy policy states the database holds a professional name, job title and employer, a business email, a business phone number, a public profile URL and a city and country — and that home addresses, personal phone numbers and personal email addresses are not knowingly collected. The API documentation nonetheless describes a "mobile number" field on the profile response, which the policy does not explain. Either way, do not plan a passive-candidate campaign around personal mobiles here.

It finds nobody for you

Every endpoint takes an identifier you already have: a profile URL, an email, a name plus a company, or a domain. There is no search by skills, titles or boolean, no shortlist and no messaging. Discovery still happens in LinkedIn, in your ATS or in a sourcing platform.

The published claims contradict each other

Coverage is given as 50M+ profiles on four pages and 500M+ on two others. Response time is 200ms on one page, under 100ms on another and about three seconds in the documentation, which also describes the richest endpoint as a live scrape taking roughly a minute. The pricing page states two different credit costs for the same lookup, and the annual plan cards disagree with the annual FAQ. Treat every published figure as a question for the vendor rather than a fact.

SOC 2 and uptime are asserted, not evidenced

Two marketing pages carry a "SOC 2 Compliant" badge and a 99.9% uptime figure, one of them labelled an SLA. No auditor, report or date is given, the privacy policy and terms name no certification at all, and the terms state the opposite of an availability promise: the service is not warranted to be uninterrupted, and SLA guarantees are offered only inside a custom arrangement. Ask for the report before relying on either.

The integration list is ahead of the integrations

The homepage advertises a native Zapier integration and shows logos for Make, HubSpot, Clay and Airtable. The vendor's own integrations page marks Zapier and Make as not yet submitted to their marketplaces, the n8n community node as not yet published, and the one-click Clay source as not built. What is Live is the API, webhooks, the Sheets add-on, n8n templates, an MCP server and HubSpot.

The counterparty is a sole trader, and no team is published

The footer, the privacy policy and the terms all name the same operator: an Entrepreneur Individuel registered in France. That is a legal form rather than a headcount — a sole trader may employ staff — but no team is published anywhere on the site, there is no SLA in the contract, and liability is capped at twelve months of fees. None of that is a reason to avoid the product; it belongs in the same sentence as any plan to make it load-bearing.

Where the data comes from is not settled

The privacy policy lists the sources as company websites, public business directories, professional disclosures and official corporate registries. It does not mention LinkedIn. The API documentation describes one endpoint as triggering a live LinkedIn scrape, and the site carries a page on scraping LinkedIn without getting banned. The terms make the buyer an independent data controller who must establish its own lawful basis, so this gap is the buyer's to close before an EU campaign, not the vendor's.