What is the difference between Recruit CRM and Pin (ATS)?

Recruit CRM and Pin (ATS) are both recruiting tools. Full-stack ATS + CRM built for recruitment agencies doing 10+ placements/month. Fast once set up; genuine 2-4 week learning curve to get there. Modern applicant tracking system with AI-powered candidate matching, automated workflows, and clean analytics for growing teams. Compare features, pricing, and more on SourcrLab.

Is Recruit CRM or Pin (ATS) more affordable?

Recruit CRM pricing: Paid (from $85/user/month). Pin (ATS) pricing: Paid.

All comparisons

Recruit CRM

67/100

Full-stack ATS + CRM built for recruitment agencies doing 10+ placements/month. Fast once set up; genuine 2-4 week learning curve to get there.

Pin (ATS)

35/100

Modern applicant tracking system with AI-powered candidate matching, automated workflows, and clean analytics for growing teams.

Recruit CRM vs Pin (ATS)

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall

Recruit CRM

Rating 9.8/5

Best value

Recruit CRM

From $85/user/month

Best for specialized needs

Pin (ATS)

Growing companies

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	Recruit CRM	Pin (ATS)
Pricing	Pricing on request(Starting from $85/user/month)	Pricing on request
Free Plan	No	No
Free Trial	No	No
Key Features	Agency-first ATS + CRM in one platform AI-powered candidate matching and ranking Multi-client pipeline tracking Placement tracking + billing Shared candidate pools across consultants Automated email sequences and outreach Client portal for submittal feedback Resume parsing + enrichment Interview scheduling with calendar sync Reporting + dashboards 5,000+ integrations (Zapier, native APIs) Mobile apps (iOS + Android)	Applicant tracking & pipeline management Resume parsing & storage Interview scheduling Collaborative hiring workflows Job board posting & distribution Reporting & analytics dashboard
Best For	agency agency-owner 5-25-consultants 10-plus-placements-monthly	Growing companies HR departments Talent acquisition teams Recruiting agencies
Pros	Built for agency workflows first. not adapted from corporate HR AI candidate matching cuts initial shortlist time meaningfully (40-60% in our tests) Multi-client billing + placement tracking native. not bolted on like Bullhorn 5,000+ integrations via native connectors + Zapier Strong G2 reputation: 4.9/5 on 345+ reviews. and it shows in day-to-day UX	No more scattered spreadsheets or siloed information Transparent handoffs between sourcers, recruiters, and HMs Eliminates the slowest steps in your hiring process Every candidate interaction feels intentional and professional
Cons	2-4 week real onboarding before the workflow pays back. budget for this Per-seat pricing stops scaling economically above ~25 seats Reporting customization weaker than Bullhorn for enterprise-grade analytics Mobile app exists but is clearly secondary. not ideal for field recruiters Data migration from Bullhorn/Loxo can be messy and error-prone without import-support help	Expect 2-4 weeks for full migration and team training Costs grow quickly as you add users or seats Core workflows may require paid add-ons

Recruit CRM. Pricing Details

Paid - Starting at $85/user/month

Pin (ATS). Pricing Details

Paid - Custom pricing

Visit Recruit CRM Visit Pin (ATS)

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections

⚖️Bullhorn vs Recruit CRM ⚖️Recruit CRM vs Zoho Recruit 🛠️Recruit CRM. Full Review 🛠️Pin (ATS). Full Review 🛠️Recruit CRM Alternatives 🛠️Pin (ATS) Alternatives 📋Best Passive Candidate Sourcing Tools for Startups 📋Best Passive Candidate Sourcing Tools for Agencies

← View all comparisons