Gregory Rubin
Recruitment professional
Very good ATS but some basic features need an update. The new AI features are very handy. Support is also very good
Collaborative ATS
Primary sources checkedRecruitee
ATS built around hiring teams working together, part of Tellent, priced by plan and employee count on annual terms.
The short answer
- Best for
- In-house teams where hiring managers do real work in the system
- Not ideal for
- Anyone comparing on price today — nothing is published in any form
- Price
- Quote only. Three plans, no figures, and list prices rose 5 percent on renewals from January 2026
- Closest alternative
- WorkableA published price today, and a light HR layer alongside the hiring process
At a glance
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Ease of useUnknown
- ImplementationFair
- Price transparencyWeak
- Value for moneyUnknown
- ScalabilityUnknown
Why these assessments
- Recruitment fitStrong
- An ATS designed around a hiring team working together, with the careers page and distribution included.
- Ease of useUnknown
- We have not used it, and we found no independent account of how hiring managers experience it.
- ImplementationFair
- A trial is offered on the middle tier and the careers page comes with it, but monthly billing still means a year.
- Price transparencyWeak
- No published price in any form, the plan structure changed, and renewal prices moved upward.
- Value for moneyUnknown
- There is no figure of any kind to weigh the collaborative design against.
- ScalabilityUnknown
- Pricing moves with plan and employee count, but neither the levels nor the steps are published.
Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.
Where it sits
- Discover
- Apply
- Screen
- ATS
- Interview
- Hire
The SourcrLab bottom line
A well-regarded collaborative ATS whose commercial side has become opaque: three plan names, no numbers, and a monthly option that still ties you in for a year. Ask for the quote at your employee count and for what happens at renewal.
Best fit
Small to mid-sized in-house teams that want a clean, collaborative hiring process and a careers page, without an enterprise implementation.
Think twice if
Anyone comparing on price today. Nothing is published, the structure changed, and existing subscriptions saw list prices rise 5 percent on renewals from January 2026.
SourcrLab assessment
Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.
Why choose Recruitee?
Collaboration is the design, not a permission setting
The product is built for hiring managers and recruiters working the same pipeline, which is where lighter tools quietly push everything back onto the recruiter.
Careers page and distribution included
Careers site, job distribution, workflows and reporting come with the platform, so a small team can run a complete process without add-ons.
A trial on the mid tier
The free trial runs on the Advance plan rather than a stripped-down version, so what you test is close to what you would buy.
Main trade-offs
No published price, in any form
Start, Advance and Optimize are named but not priced. The vendor states the subscription depends on plan, employee count and billing period, which tells you the shape and not the size.
Monthly billing still means a year
Paying monthly carries a minimum commitment of one year; annual payment takes 20 percent off. There is no genuinely short-term option.
Renewal prices moved
List prices for existing subscriptions rose 5 percent on renewals from 1 January 2026. Budget for the renewal, not just the first year.
Pricing and buying reality
Quote only, no public pricing
- Three plans: Start, Advance and Optimize. No figures are published
- The vendor states pricing depends on the plan, your employee count and the billing period
- Annual payment takes 20 percent off; monthly payment requires a one-year minimum commitment
- Free trial available, on the Advance plan. Agencies are quoted separately
What we do not know
- Any price, at any employee count
- The trial length
- What separates Start, Advance and Optimize in numbers
Checked August 2026. We do not list a price we have not verified ourselves. Recruitee pricing page
How it fits your stack
Works with
- Job boards and your HR stack, through integrations
Likely replaces
- A separately built careers page and manual job distribution
May overlap with
- Teamtailor and Workable at the same end of the market
Check before buying
- The quote at your employee count, and at next year's
- What happens to the price at renewal
Recruitee vs alternatives
Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.
Workable
Choose Workable if you want a published price today and a light HR layer alongside hiring.
Teamtailor
Consider Teamtailor if the career site and unlimited users are the point; also quote-based.
Ashby
Consider Ashby if you want published pricing and deeper reporting under 100 employees.
Recruiter reviews
Each reviewer supplied a LinkedIn profile, which a person at SourcrLab checked before publishing. The experience described is theirs, unedited; the vendor cannot approve, edit or remove it.
Used Recruitee?
Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical — all useful.
Evidence
- Plan names and quote-only pricing — checked against a primary source: Recruitee pricing page
- Billing terms and annual discount — checked against a primary source: Recruitee pricing page
- Renewal price increase from January 2026 — vendor claim, not independently verified: Recruitee pricing page
- Any price level — not enough evidence
- SourcrLab hands-on use — not enough evidence
Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information
Work at Recruitee?
Email us to verify this profile or suggest a factual update.