Skip to content
SourcrLab
Recruit Wizard logo

Australian agency recruitment CRM and ATS, built as one system

Primary sources checked

Recruit Wizard

Recruit Wizard puts candidate, contact, client, job and placement records in a single CRM and ATS, with automation, an AI note taker, SMS and marketing, e-signing, phone-number sourcing and a reporting engine included rather than bolted on. Built in Australia for agencies, internal teams and RPOs. The vendor publishes no price.

The short answer

Best for
A recruitment business whose consultants do business development and delivery in the same day, and who are currently paying separately for SMS, e-signing and contact enrichment
Not ideal for
Buyers who need a published price before a sales conversation, and European teams for whom hosting location is a procurement condition rather than a preference
Price
Not published by the vendor; review directories report USD 99 and USD 129 per user/month
Closest alternative
JobAdder logo
JobAdderThe established Australian agency platform with a large integration marketplace, when an ecosystem you can extend matters more than having SMS, e-signing and enrichment already inside the product.

At a glance

  • Recruitment fitStrong
  • Ease of useUnknown
  • ImplementationUnknown
  • Price transparencyWeak
  • Value for moneyUnknown
  • ScalabilityFair
Why these assessments
Recruitment fitStrong
The record model is recruitment's own โ€” candidate, contact, client, job, placement as one connected object โ€” and the bundled modules are the ones agency desks actually buy separately: SMS, e-signing, phone-number sourcing, a note taker for client and candidate calls.
Ease of useUnknown
SourcrLab has not used it. On an all-in-one agency system the daily experience is decided by the two or three screens a consultant never leaves, and no public evidence speaks to those.
ImplementationUnknown
Nothing was found on migration scope, onboarding or go-live time. For a system that becomes the record of every candidate, client and placement a firm has, that is the number that decides whether a switch is affordable.
Price transparencyWeak
No reachable pricing page on the vendor's own site. Two software directories report USD 99 for a Core plan and USD 129 for a Premium plan adding automation and generative AI, with optional extras that may cost more. A directory field is not a vendor commitment, and the currency on an Australian product is itself worth confirming.
Value for moneyUnknown
Not assessable while the only figures available come from review directories rather than the vendor. The bundling argument is real โ€” SMS, e-signing and enrichment are separate subscriptions in most agency stacks โ€” but it cannot be weighed against a price nobody has published.
ScalabilityFair
The vendor names boutique agencies through to multi-office organisations and RPOs as distinct shapes, and describes adding users, automation, reporting and integrations as volume grows. Without a published seat price, how the cost behaves across that range cannot be stated.

Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.

Where it sits

  1. Discover
  2. Contact
  3. Apply
  4. ATS
  5. Interview
  6. Hire

The SourcrLab bottom line

A single-record agency platform rather than a CRM and an ATS sold together. The connected object is candidate, contact, client, job and placement, and the modules around it are the ones an agency normally pays for separately: automation with workflow triggers and activity capture, an AI note taker for summaries and matching, SMS and email marketing with one message history, e-signing with document generation and secure storage on pay-as-you-go rather than a per-user fee, Looking Glass for phone-number sourcing and contact enrichment, and a real-time analytics engine. The vendor is careful about security in a way worth reading precisely: it describes controlled cloud environments, access controls and operational security practices, and says hosting arrangements can reflect customer location and security requirements including Australian hosting for relevant customers. That is a statement about what can be arranged, not a residency guarantee, and a European buyer should read it as the start of a procurement conversation rather than the end of one.

Best fit

An agency that has stopped being able to answer simple questions because the answer lives in three systems: which client this candidate was submitted to, when the contract was signed, what the last SMS said. Recruit Wizard's argument is that those are one record rather than three, and it backs it by including the modules that usually cause the split โ€” SMS and marketing, e-signing with document generation and storage, phone-number sourcing and enrichment, and an AI note taker that captures the conversation itself.

Think twice if

There is no price on the vendor's site. Two directories report USD 99 per user per month for Core and USD 129 for Premium, which adds automation and generative AI, and note that optional extras may cost more. Treat those as a starting point for the conversation rather than a quote, and confirm the currency: this is an Australian product and a US-dollar figure on a review site is exactly the kind of detail those listings get wrong. Ask about migration too, because nothing public describes it.

SourcrLab assessment

Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.

Why choose Recruit Wizard?

One record, not two systems in step

Candidate, contact, client, job and placement are described as a single connected record rather than a CRM synced to an ATS. For a consultant who sells and delivers, that is the seam that costs the most time when it is missing, and the most trust when it is wrong.

The bundled modules are the ones agencies buy separately

SMS and marketing, e-signing with document generation and storage, and phone-number sourcing through Looking Glass are each a subscription in a typical agency stack. Including exactly those, rather than a generic feature list, is what makes the consolidation argument concrete โ€” and e-signing is priced pay-as-you-go rather than per user, which is the right shape for a module most people use in bursts.

The AI is scoped to work a recruiter recognises

The vendor describes context-aware assistance for summaries, matching and conversation capture through a note taker, rather than an autonomous agent that decides things. That is a narrower claim than most of this category makes, and a narrower claim is easier to test on your own calls.

Main trade-offs

The vendor publishes no price

No pricing page was reachable on the vendor's own site. The USD 99 Core and USD 129 Premium figures come from software review directories, which also note that optional extras may add cost. A directory field is not a quote, and on an Australian product the currency itself needs confirming before you budget from it.

Hosting is an arrangement, not a guarantee

The security statement says hosting arrangements can reflect customer location and security requirements, including Australian hosting for relevant customers. Read that as written: it describes what may be arranged for a given customer, not a published residency commitment, and it says nothing specific about EU hosting. For a European buyer with procurement conditions, that is a question to settle in writing rather than an answer.

Breadth needs testing module by module

An all-in-one that includes SMS, e-signing, enrichment, a note taker and an analytics engine is making five claims beyond the ATS. A bundled module is not automatically equal to the specialist product it replaces, so test the two or three your desk depends on rather than counting them.

Migration and contract terms are unestablished

Contract term, migration scope and onboarding effort were not found anywhere public. For a system that will hold every candidate, client and placement record a firm has, those decide whether the switch is affordable, and all three are missing.

Pricing and buying reality

Not published by the vendor; directories report USD 99 and USD 129 per user/month

  • No pricing page was reachable on the vendor's own site on 31 August 2026
  • Software review directories report a Core plan at USD 99 per user per month covering CRM and ATS, custom workflow and real-time dashboards
  • The same sources report a Premium plan at USD 129 per user per month adding automation and generative AI, and note optional extras that may cost more
  • These are third-party directory figures, not vendor commitments, and are not published here as the price
  • E-signing is described by the vendor as pay-as-you-go, with no monthly per-user fee

What we do not know

  • The vendor's own price, and whether the directory figures are in USD or AUD
  • Contract term, minimum users and notice period
  • Migration scope, onboarding effort and any implementation fee
  • Which optional extras are chargeable, and what the e-signing and enrichment usage rates are

Checked August 2026. We do not list a price we have not verified ourselves.

How it fits your stack

Works with

  • A growing range of job, communication, productivity and compliance integrations, described by category rather than named
  • Existing phone and email workflows, through built-in SMS and message history

Likely replaces

  • A separate SMS, e-signing and contact-enrichment subscription
  • A CRM kept alongside the ATS for business development
  • A standalone meeting note taker for client and candidate calls

May overlap with

  • Established agency platforms with large integration marketplaces

Check before buying

  • The vendor's own price and currency in writing, since the only figures available come from review directories
  • The contract term, migration scope and any implementation fee
  • Where your data would actually be hosted, in writing, if location is a procurement condition
  • Your specific job boards and compliance tools by name against the integration list
  • Depth of the two or three bundled modules your desk depends on

Recruit Wizard vs alternatives

Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.

JobAdder logo
JobAdder

Choose JobAdder when you want the established Australian agency platform with a broad integration marketplace, and would rather add specialist tools than rely on bundled ones.

Recruit CRM logo
Recruit CRM

Choose Recruit CRM for the same agency ATS and CRM consolidation with published per-user pricing and a large independent review base behind it.

Vincere logo
Vincere

Consider Vincere for an agency operating system with comparable breadth across recruitment, commercial and reporting workflows.

Used Recruit Wizard?

Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical โ€” all useful.

Share your experience

Evidence

Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information

Work at Recruit Wizard?

Verify this profile or suggest a factual update. Free.

Claim this profile โ€” free