Enterprise and public-sector AI hiring suite, with EVA-REC as the ATS inside it
ResearchedElevatus
Elevatus sells an AI hiring suite to medium-to-large employers and government, with EVA-REC as the applicant tracking platform inside it: end-to-end acquire-to-hire, resume filtering, AI candidate matching and a centralised resume database. It publishes no price, and the one figure circulating on an aggregator is not one.
The short answer
- Best for
- A medium-to-large employer or government body that wants AI-assisted screening and matching inside one configured hiring platform
- Not ideal for
- SMBs wanting self-serve onboarding and a rate card they can read before speaking to anyone
- Price
- Not publicly priced — no first-party rate was established
- Closest alternative
- GreenhouseThe reference point for structured enterprise hiring with a far larger independent evidence base behind it
At a glance
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Ease of useUnknown
- ImplementationUnknown
- Price transparencyWeak
- Value for moneyUnknown
- ScalabilityFair
Why these assessments
- Recruitment fitStrong
- EVA-REC is a hiring platform rather than a module of an HR suite: requisition-to-hire workflow, resume database and candidate matching are the product.
- Ease of useUnknown
- No SourcrLab hands-on use. Capterra reviewers rate ease highly across 82 reviews, which is a genuine signal but not a substitute for an evaluation.
- ImplementationUnknown
- The vendor claims deployment in under a week. That is a vendor claim about a configurable enterprise platform, and nothing independent corroborates it.
- Price transparencyWeak
- No first-party price was established anywhere. The only figure in circulation sits on an aggregator with unclear semantics and is not treated as a price here.
- Value for moneyUnknown
- Not assessed, and it cannot be assessed: there is no established price to weigh the capability against.
- ScalabilityFair
- Positioned for medium-to-large companies and government, which implies scale, but no independent evidence at enterprise volume was available to confirm it.
Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.
Where it sits
- Apply
- Screen
- Enterprise ATS
- Interview
- Hire
The SourcrLab bottom line
A credible enterprise and government hiring suite whose independent evidence needs reading carefully. Capterra carries 4.8 across 82 reviews for EVA-REC, which is a reasonable base. G2 shows Elevatus at 5.0 across seven reviews overall while EVA-REC itself has only three — a perfect score on three reviews is not a market verdict and is not treated as one here. On price, Capterra exposes a $10,000 field described as 'per feature, per month'; no first-party page corroborates it, the semantics are unclear, and this brief records it as aggregator metadata rather than as Elevatus's price.
Best fit
Enterprise and public-sector buyers who want AI-assisted screening and matching as part of the hiring platform rather than as a separate tool bolted onto it, and who are comfortable with a procurement-style purchase where price comes from a conversation.
Think twice if
Anyone who needs to compare on cost, and any team that wants to sign up and start. Nothing is published, the independent evidence for EVA-REC specifically is thin, and the deployment speed the vendor advertises is not corroborated by anyone else.
SourcrLab assessment
Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.
Why choose Elevatus?
AI matching is part of the platform, not an add-on
Resume filtering, AI candidate matching and a centralised resume database are described as core capability rather than as a separately sold layer. For high-application-volume public-sector hiring, screening assistance inside the ATS is the difference between a usable and an unusable inbox.
A stated enterprise and government market
The vendor targets medium-to-large companies and government explicitly. Public-sector hiring has requirements — process consistency, auditability, high application volumes — that a product aimed at startups rarely handles well, so the stated focus is meaningful.
A reasonable independent base on Capterra
4.8 out of 5 across 82 reviews at the time of checking, with reviewers rating ease of use, features and support strongly. That is the evidence base worth weighing for this product, and it is far more informative than the G2 profile.
One suite rather than an assembly
The acquire-to-hire workflow, interview scheduling and the resume database sit in the same product. For a buyer whose alternative is an ATS plus a screening tool plus a scheduling tool, consolidating those is a real reduction in integration and vendor-management work.
Main trade-offs
The $10,000 figure on Capterra is not a price
Capterra exposes a $10,000 field qualified as 'per feature, per month'. No first-party page corroborates it, the semantics are unclear, and a figure like that quoted out of context would misrepresent the vendor badly in either direction. It is recorded here as aggregator metadata and is deliberately not used as pricing.
The G2 score is built on almost nothing
Elevatus shows 5.0 out of 5 across seven G2 reviews overall, and EVA-REC itself carries only three. A perfect score on three reviews tells you almost nothing about a product sold to enterprises, and reading it as market consensus would be a mistake. Weigh the Capterra base instead.
Deployment in under a week is a vendor claim
The vendor states deployment in under one week. For a configurable platform sold to enterprises and government that is a striking claim, and nothing independent corroborates it. Ask what 'deployed' covers — a tenant, or a configured, integrated and governed hiring process.
Security and compliance are not established
No named certification or documented compliance scope was established for this brief, and none is inferred from the enterprise and government positioning. A public-sector buyer needs that documented, and the vendor is the only place to get it.
Pricing and buying reality
Not publicly priced
- No first-party public price was established for EVA-REC or the wider suite
- A $10,000 field on Capterra, qualified as 'per feature, per month', is aggregator metadata and is not corroborated by the vendor
What we do not know
- The actual contract price and what it is metered on
- Whether EVA-REC can be licensed separately from the wider suite
- Enterprise implementation obligations behind the under-one-week deployment claim
- Named security and compliance certifications and their scope
Checked August 2026. We do not list a price we have not verified ourselves.
How it fits your stack
Works with
- Job boards and application channels feeding the resume database
- Video assessment through the vendor's own adjacent product
Likely replaces
- A separate ATS plus a separate resume-screening tool
- Manual longlisting of high-volume application inboxes
May overlap with
- Standalone AI screening and matching products, which duplicate the platform's own matching layer
Check before buying
- The actual price and the meter, since nothing public exists to anchor a negotiation
- What the under-one-week deployment claim includes, and what it excludes
- Named certifications and data-residency terms, particularly for public-sector procurement
- Whether the AI matching can be audited and explained, which procurement usually requires
Elevatus vs alternatives
Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.
Choose Greenhouse when structured hiring and a large, well-established independent evidence base matter more than a bundled AI matching layer.
Consider SmartRecruiters if you want enterprise hiring breadth with a broad integration marketplace and a more established commercial track record.
Consider ClearCompany when you want hiring, onboarding and performance in one quote-led talent suite rather than an AI-first hiring platform.
Used Elevatus?
Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical — all useful.
Evidence
- EVA-REC is the ATS and hiring platform inside the Elevatus suite — checked against a primary source: EVA-REC hiring platform page (acquire-to-hire workflow, resume filtering, interview scheduling, centralised resume database, AI candidate matching)
- End-to-end acquire-to-hire workflow — vendor claim, not independently verified: EVA-REC hiring platform page (acquire-to-hire workflow, resume filtering, interview scheduling, centralised resume database, AI candidate matching)
- Resume filtering, interview scheduling, centralised resume database and AI candidate matching — vendor claim, not independently verified: EVA-REC hiring platform page (acquire-to-hire workflow, resume filtering, interview scheduling, centralised resume database, AI candidate matching)
- Targets medium-to-large companies and government — vendor claim, not independently verified: Elevatus homepage (suite positioning, target market of medium-to-large companies and government, deployment claim)
- Vendor claims deployment in under one week; nothing independent corroborates it — vendor claim, not independently verified: Elevatus homepage (suite positioning, target market of medium-to-large companies and government, deployment claim)
- Capterra rating of 4.8 across 82 reviews — checked against a primary source: Capterra listing and reviews (4.8 out of 5 across 82 reviews at check time; also carries an unqualified $10,000 'per feature, per month' metadata field)
- G2 shows Elevatus at 5.0 across 7 reviews overall, with only 3 for EVA-REC itself — too small to read as consensus — checked against a primary source: G2 seller profile (Elevatus 5.0 out of 5 across 7 reviews overall; EVA-REC itself carries only 3 reviews)
- Capterra's $10,000 'per feature, per month' field is aggregator metadata, not a corroborated price — checked against a primary source: Capterra listing and reviews (4.8 out of 5 across 82 reviews at check time; also carries an unqualified $10,000 'per feature, per month' metadata field)
- Actual contract pricing and the billing meter — not enough evidence
- Named security and compliance certifications and their scope — not enough evidence
- Enterprise implementation obligations — not enough evidence
- SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work. — not enough evidence
Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information
Work at Elevatus?
Email us to verify this profile or suggest a factual update.