Skip to content
SourcrLab

Make this comparison fit your situation

Three quick choices. No extra page and no hidden score shown.

You work as

Recruitment team

Budget pressure

The static comparison stays the source; this only re-weights the fit for your context.

All comparisons
Hunter.io logo

Hunter.io

B2B discovery, enrichment and email outreach platform, not recruitment-native. Every plan carries the Discover database, with basic filters free and advanced filters from Starter. Free gives 50 credits a month; Starter EUR 34, Growth EUR 104 and Scale EUR 209 per month on annual billing, with 24,000 to 300,000 credits a year. One credit finds an email, half a credit verifies one, and team members are unlimited on every plan.

VS
RocketReach logo

RocketReach

B2B contact database with a built-in outreach layer, not recruitment software. A free account gives 5 lookups. On annual billing every tier has unlimited verified lookups: Essentials USD 19/month (email only), Pro USD 52 (adds mobile and direct dials), Ultimate USD 115. On monthly billing the same plans cost USD 39, 79 and 169 and are metered at 100, 250 and 1,000 lookups. Exports are the real ceiling at 1,200, 3,600 or 20,000 a year. Bullhorn is the only recruitment system among the integrations.

Hunter.io vs RocketReach

Decision guidance

**Pick Hunter.io if:** - You source from known target companies using domain search - You need email verification before sending bulk campaigns - You want a free plan for low-volume or trial use **Pick RocketReach if:** - You need phone numbers as much as email addresses - You do person-first lookups across a wide candidate pool - You run high-volume cold outreach across many companies **Skip both if:** - You already have LinkedIn Recruiter InMail credits and don't cold-email **Verdict:** Hunter.io for account-based sourcing; RocketReach for breadth and phone access.

Summary

Hunter.io and RocketReach both find professional email addresses and phone numbers, but they approach the problem differently. Hunter.io started as a domain-based email finder-you plug in a company domain, it returns employee emails with verification scores. It excels when you're sourcing from specific target companies or doing account-based recruiting. The email verifier is its standout: you can upload lists and clean them before sending. RocketReach positions itself as a broader people database (700M+ profiles) with more direct person-to-person lookup. You search by name, title, or company, and it returns contact info pulled from its aggregated data. RocketReach tends to surface more phone numbers than Hunter.io, which matters if your outreach strategy leans on calls. The pricing gap is narrow ($49 vs. $53/month), but Hunter.io offers a free plan with 25 searches/month-enough for occasional users to test or handle low-volume needs. RocketReach has no free tier. Both suffer from the same core problem: contact data goes stale fast, especially for passive candidates who change roles. Hunter.io's verification layer helps, but neither tool guarantees 100% accuracy. For executive or hard-to-reach niche roles, both struggle equally. Hunter.io's campaign features (basic email sequences) add minor outreach value, but neither replaces a real engagement platform. In practice, agency recruiters working high-volume requisitions across multiple client companies tend to favor RocketReach's broader database. In-house teams targeting specific competitor companies or doing account-based sourcing lean toward Hunter.io's domain search. If you're already using LinkedIn Recruiter and just need occasional email fill-in, Hunter.io's free plan might be enough. If you're doing cold outreach at scale and need phone numbers, RocketReach's dataset is wider.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Only compare claims that SourcrLab can currently support. Unknowns stay unknown; verify buyer-critical details before purchase.

Decision factorHunter.ioRocketReach
PricingFreemium (from Free, then from EUR 34/month billed annually)Freemium (from Free, then from USD 19/month billed annually)
Free planYesYes
Free trialNoNo
Key features
  • Discover B2B database with an AI assistant: basic filters free, advanced filters from Starter
  • Email Finder, Domain Search and Email Verifier, metered in credits
  • Lead enrichment and auto-verification, from the Starter plan
  • Campaign sending from connected Gmail or Outlook accounts, with an AI writing assistant from Starter
  • API access, plus a separate API-only Data Platform line
  • Unlimited team members on every plan, including the free one
  • Contact and company search across a B2B database, with filters for title, industry, location, technographics and intent
  • Personal and professional email lookups on every tier; mobile and direct dials from Pro
  • Chrome extension for looking up a contact on the page you are viewing
  • Messages, sequences and an AI email writer, capped at 500 emails a day
  • Autopilot with 5, 10 or 25 active jobs by tier
  • Integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft and Bullhorn, plus API access
Best for
  • Recruiters whose gap is contactability rather than a hiring process
  • Finding companies and the people in them, then verifying the addresses
  • Small teams, since seats are not what you pay for
  • Recruiters who need mobile numbers as often as email addresses
  • Desks that can commit annually and want to stop rationing lookups
  • Agencies already working in Bullhorn
Pros None listed None listed
Trade-offs
  • Discover is organised around companies and roles, not around candidate skills or availability, and there is no pipeline
  • Email only, with no phone numbers
  • Monthly billing costs roughly 30 percent more than an annual commitment
  • Connected mailboxes are capped at 1, 3, 10 or 20 by plan even though team members are not
  • Whether unused credits roll over is not published
  • Vendor compliance material does not answer your own lawful basis for contacting candidates
  • Unlimited lookups exist only on annual billing; monthly meters the same plans at 100 to 1,000
  • Exports cap at 1,200, 3,600 or 20,000 a year and that is what list building spends
  • The save-50-percent headline only holds on the cheapest plan
  • Essentials carries no phone numbers at all
  • Search is organised around companies and job titles, with no skills, availability or pipeline
  • Personal emails and direct dials leave the lawful basis for contacting candidates entirely with the buyer
Visit Hunter.ioVisit RocketReach

Explore Related Comparisons & Tools