Apollo.io vs HireEZ

Decision guidance

**Pick Apollo.io if:** - You're testing outbound recruiting or hiring under 15 people per month - You need email sequences and intent data, not just contact info - Budget is tight and freemium lets you start without commitment **Pick HireEZ if:** - You're sourcing 20+ hires per month across multiple roles - Diversity sourcing and compliance reporting are table stakes - You want 45+ sources aggregated without manual boolean across platforms **Skip both if:** - You hire fewer than 5 people per year; LinkedIn alone is enough **Verdict:** Apollo for lean teams testing outbound at low cost; HireEZ for volume recruiters who need diversity filters and deeper aggregation.

Summary

Apollo.io and HireEZ both aggregate candidate data from multiple sources, but they split on pricing model and data scale. Apollo gives you 275M contacts starting at $49/month with a freemium tier, making it viable for smaller teams or recruiters testing outbound sourcing. HireEZ starts at $169/user/month with no free option, but pulls from 45+ named sources and includes built-in diversity filters that Apollo doesn't emphasize. In practice, Apollo skews toward high-volume, sales-adjacent recruiting where email sequences and intent signals matter. HireEZ is purpose-built for recruiting teams that need deeper candidate aggregation and diversity-focused sourcing. Both rely on third-party data refresh cycles, so contact accuracy will always lag real-time changes. Apollo's lower entry cost attracts in-house teams running lean or agencies hiring 5-15 people per month. HireEZ's price point assumes you're sourcing at scale (20+ hires/month) or need compliance-friendly diversity reporting. If you're already using LinkedIn Recruiter and just need contact enrichment, Apollo's Chrome extension does that for less. If you're building talent pipelines across niche roles or underrepresented groups, HireEZ's aggregation and filters justify the spend.