Assessment and candidate engagement platform, licensed flat
Primary sources checkedTazio
Tazio One bundles validated assessments, video interviewing, assessment-centre tooling, a candidate portal and reporting into one licence from £1,500 a month, with unlimited candidates, admin users and roles. Early careers and graduate recruitment are where it positions hardest.
The short answer
- Best for
- A graduate or early-careers programme processing thousands of applicants a season, where a per-candidate meter would make the volume the enemy
- Not ideal for
- SMB teams buying assessments self-serve — the entry licence is £1,500 a month and the buying motion is a contract, not a card
- Price
- Licence from £1,500/month, paid monthly, quarterly or annually
- Closest alternative
- HireVueThe larger comparable when enterprise assessment and video interviewing depth, validation evidence and global scale weigh more than a flat unlimited licence.
At a glance
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Ease of useUnknown
- ImplementationFair
- Price transparencyFair
- Value for moneyUnknown
- ScalabilityStrong
Why these assessments
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Assessments, video interviewing, assessment centres, a candidate portal, process management and ATS integration are all hiring-specific, and the early-careers positioning is explicit rather than inferred.
- Ease of useUnknown
- SourcrLab has not used it. On an assessment platform the experience that decides the outcome is the candidate's, and that is not visible from a product page.
- ImplementationFair
- Setup and customer success are stated as included in the licence, which removes a common surprise line. It remains an assessment programme rather than a signup: rubrics, sifting logic and candidate communications all have to be designed before a season runs.
- Price transparencyFair
- The starting licence and what it includes are published, which is rare at this end of the market. What is not published is what moves a quote above the floor, and bespoke assessments, reports and advanced integrations are all quoted separately.
- Value for moneyUnknown
- Not assessed. £18,000 a year buys a great deal at ten thousand candidates and very little at two hundred, and the assessment catalogue's validation detail — the thing that would justify the price — was not established.
- ScalabilityStrong
- Unlimited candidates, admin users and roles inside the licence is the defining commercial property. A graduate campaign that doubles its applicant numbers does not double its bill, which is the opposite of how usage-metered assessment tools behave.
Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.
Where it sits
- Apply
- Screen
- Interview
- Decision
The SourcrLab bottom line
Tazio One is positioned as a candidate engagement platform for end-to-end assessment workflows, and the bundle is unusually complete: validated assessments, video interviewing, assessment-centre solutions, a candidate portal, process management, analytics and reporting, and ATS integration, with setup and customer success inside the licence. One caution about pricing evidence: an older public-sector pricing PDF shows pay-as-you-go candidate and test fees, but that document is dated 2024 and describes a different commercial model. It has been left out of the current pricing here rather than blended into it, because mixing a historical framework rate into a current licence price is how a buyer ends up arguing about a number nobody is offering.
Best fit
Volume assessment where the volume is the point. Graduate and early-careers campaigns run in seasons: thousands of applications arrive in weeks, every one gets the same structured process, and a per-candidate price turns a successful campaign into a budget problem. An unlimited licence removes that tension entirely, and that commercial shape is the strongest reason to look at Tazio.
Think twice if
£1,500 a month is a floor, not a price, and it puts this in a different buying motion from self-serve assessment tools. If your assessment need is a handful of tests a quarter, the flat licence works against you as hard as it works for a graduate scheme, and bespoke assessments, reports and advanced integrations are quoted on top.
SourcrLab assessment
Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.
Why choose Tazio?
Unlimited candidates removes the volume penalty
The licence includes unlimited candidates, admin users and roles. For a seasonal graduate campaign that is the difference between designing the process you want and designing the process you can afford, and it is genuinely unusual against usage-metered assessment products.
One licence instead of an assessment stack
The off-the-shelf assessment suite, video interviewing, assessment-centre tooling, the candidate portal and reporting are all included. A team currently running a psychometric vendor, a video interview product and a separate assessment-centre process is consolidating three contracts into one.
Setup and success are inside the price
Setup, customer success and reporting are stated as part of the licence rather than as an implementation line. In a category where a first-year implementation fee routinely rivals the subscription, that is a material difference in the first-year total.
Main trade-offs
The floor puts it out of SMB reach
£1,500 a month before anything bespoke is a fundamentally different purchase from a self-serve assessment subscription. If the assessment need does not justify £18,000 a year, the unlimited model is not generosity — it is a mismatch between the product and the problem.
An old public-sector price is not the current one
A 2024 public-sector pricing PDF shows pay-as-you-go candidate and test fees. It describes a different model at a different time, and treating it as current pricing would put a buyer and a vendor in a conversation about a commercial structure that is no longer on offer.
The assessment catalogue is not enumerated
The exact assessment catalogue, psychometric validation detail and named ATS integrations were not established. For a buyer whose selection process has to defend itself, the validation evidence behind each instrument is the material question and it needs asking directly.
Pricing and buying reality
Licence from £1,500/month
- Licence starts at £1,500 per month
- Payable monthly, quarterly or annually
- Includes unlimited candidates, admin users and roles
- Includes the full off-the-shelf assessment suite, video interviewing, ATS integration, setup, customer success and reporting
- Bespoke assessments, reports and advanced integrations are custom quoted
- An older public-sector pricing document dated 2024 shows pay-as-you-go candidate and test fees; it describes a historical model and is not current pricing
What we do not know
- What moves a quote above the £1,500 floor
- Cost of bespoke assessments, reports and advanced integrations
- Minimum contract term
Checked on the vendor's pricing page, August 2026. Pricing page (£1,500/month licence floor, billing cadence, unlimited candidates, users and roles, what is included and what is quoted)
How it fits your stack
Works with
- An existing ATS, plus HR and third-party scheduling systems
- Graduate and early-careers campaign processes
Likely replaces
- A separate psychometric vendor, video interview product and assessment-centre process
May overlap with
- The assessment and interview modules of an enterprise ATS
Check before buying
- The validation evidence behind each assessment you intend to use
- Which ATS systems integrate, by name, and what the integration does
- What sits outside the £1,500 floor for your specific process
Tazio vs alternatives
Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.
Choose HireVue when enterprise assessment and video interviewing depth, published validation work and global scale matter more than an unlimited flat licence.
Choose SHL when the psychometric instruments themselves are the purchase and their validation evidence has to stand up to scrutiny on its own.
Consider VidCruiter when structured video interviewing and configurable selection workflows are the core need and a full assessment suite is not.
Used Tazio?
Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical — all useful.
Evidence
- Tazio One is positioned as a candidate engagement platform for end-to-end assessment workflows — checked against a primary source: Tazio One platform page (assessment, video interviewing, assessment centres, candidate portal, process management, reporting, early-careers positioning)
- Includes validated assessments, video interviewing, assessment-centre solutions, a candidate portal, process management, analytics and ATS integration — checked against a primary source: Tazio One platform page (assessment, video interviewing, assessment centres, candidate portal, process management, reporting, early-careers positioning)
- Strong positioning around early careers and graduate recruitment — checked against a primary source: Tazio One platform page (assessment, video interviewing, assessment centres, candidate portal, process management, reporting, early-careers positioning)
- Licence starts at £1,500 per month, payable monthly, quarterly or annually, with unlimited candidates, admin users and roles — checked against a primary source: Pricing page (£1,500/month licence floor, billing cadence, unlimited candidates, users and roles, what is included and what is quoted)
- Setup, customer success and reporting are included; bespoke assessments, reports and advanced integrations are custom quoted — checked against a primary source: Pricing page (£1,500/month licence floor, billing cadence, unlimited candidates, users and roles, what is included and what is quoted)
- An older public-sector pricing document dated 2024 shows pay-as-you-go candidate and test fees, describing a historical model rather than current pricing — not enough evidence
- Privacy policy describes GDPR obligations with a UK-based controller — checked against a primary source: Privacy policy (GDPR obligations, UK-based controller details)
- The exact assessment catalogue, psychometric validation detail and named ATS integrations — not enough evidence
- SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work. — not enough evidence
Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information
Work at Tazio?
Email us to verify this profile or suggest a factual update.