LinkedIn and email outreach automation
Hands-onDripify
Runs LinkedIn and email drip campaigns from the vendor's own infrastructure, so sequences continue with your browser closed, priced per seat with one LinkedIn account each.
The short answer
- Best for
- A recruiter who wants campaigns to keep running when the laptop is closed
- Not ideal for
- Anyone who cannot afford to hand a third party a standing LinkedIn session
- Price
- 7-day trial, then USD 39 to 79 per seat per month billed annually, or USD 59 to 99 monthly
- Closest alternative
- WaalaxyThe same job at a similar risk level, where the choice comes down to price and interface preference
At a glance
- Recruitment fitWeak
- Ease of useStrong
- ImplementationFair
- Price transparencyFair
- Value for moneyFair
- ScalabilityFair
Why these assessments
- Recruitment fitWeak
- A prospecting tool. The named destinations are HubSpot, Salesforce and Google Sheets, and there is no ATS in the integration list.
- Ease of useStrong
- From our own use the campaign management is solid and the drip sequences do what they say, and cloud execution removes the chore of keeping a browser open.
- ImplementationFair
- Hosted execution removes the chore of keeping a machine running, but you still hand over a LinkedIn account and build the first campaign before anything happens. Our hands-on note covers running campaigns, not how long the setup took.
- Price transparencyFair
- Both billing cycles and most tier differences are published clearly, down to the daily quota per action, but the same page contradicts itself: the comparison puts A/B testing on Advanced while the FAQ below it says Pro includes it.
- Value for moneyFair
- USD 39 a seat is competitive for hosted execution, but the daily activity ceilings come from LinkedIn rather than from the plan, so paying more does not buy more sending.
- ScalabilityFair
- One LinkedIn account per seat, so a team is a straight multiple, and the real ceiling stays LinkedIn's tolerance rather than anything the vendor sells.
Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.
Where it sits
- Discover
- Outreach
- ATS
The SourcrLab bottom line
Mainstream LinkedIn automation with the execution moved off your machine as the default rather than as a top plan. Basic at USD 39 a seat on annual billing is deliberately narrow: one campaign and 20 connection requests a day. Pro at USD 59 opens unlimited campaigns and roughly triples the daily activity, which is the tier most desks actually need. Advanced at USD 79 does not raise the activity ceiling at all: Pro and Advanced share the same quotas, and what the extra USD 20 buys is management and analysis, namely multi-team management, advanced LinkedIn protection, lead tagging, step analytics, evergreen leads and A/B testing. Read that as a team and optimisation tier rather than a volume one. From our own use it lands close to Waalaxy on features and on risk.
Best fit
Nurture rather than blast. A drip sequence that visits, connects, waits, messages and follows up over several weeks is what this shape of tool is for, and hosting the execution means it keeps going while you are in interviews or on holiday. From our own use the campaign management and analytics hold up in daily work.
Think twice if
Cloud execution is convenience and exposure in one. Somebody else holds a session against your LinkedIn account around the clock, and LinkedIn restricts accounts that automate whether the automation is polite or not. That is a decision to take deliberately, especially if the account is the one your desk depends on.
Hands-on experience
Pieter Henderyckx's take
Recruiter and founder of SourcrLab
Dripify sits in the same category as Waalaxy: LinkedIn automation with a modern interface. It's got solid campaign management, decent analytics, and the drip sequences work well for nurturing candidates over time. In practice, I found it comparable to Waalaxy in terms of features and risk level. The cloud-based approach means it runs without your browser being open, which is convenient but also means you're trusting a third party with your LinkedIn session. The same grey-zone warning applies here: LinkedIn can and does restrict accounts that automate too aggressively. For me, the key differentiator between Dripify and Waalaxy comes down to pricing and personal preference. Both get the job done if you use them responsibly.
Why choose Dripify?
Hosted execution is the default, not the top tier
Campaigns run without your browser open on every paid plan. For a multi-week nurture sequence that is the practical difference between a campaign that finishes and one that stalls the first day you work off a different machine.
Pro is where the product becomes usable
Basic allows one campaign and 20 connection requests a day. Pro at USD 59 a seat annually makes campaigns unlimited and lifts the daily ceiling to 75-plus requests and 100-plus messages. If you are comparing entry prices, compare Pro, because Basic is a trial with an invoice.
Email steps are in every paid plan
LinkedIn and email sequences both come with the subscription, plus 100 email-finder credits a month at every tier. Elsewhere in this category the email half is the upgrade or a separate add-on.
A seven-day trial on the full feature set
No card required, and it runs the Advanced features rather than a stripped version. A week is enough to see a first sequence through its early steps and judge the interface before paying.
Main trade-offs
A third party holds a standing session on your account
That is what hosted execution means. From our own use the convenience is real, and so is the exposure: the same property that keeps campaigns running keeps somebody else logged into the profile your desk depends on.
Safety algorithms are a mitigation, not a permission
The vendor states that advanced safety algorithms keep the automation secure and compliant. LinkedIn's own help pages say it does not permit third-party software that automates activity on its site, and that members using it risk restriction. Both statements can be true; only one of them can close your account.
Advanced buys management, not capacity
Pro and Advanced carry identical quotas: 75 connection requests, 100-plus messages, 30 Sales Navigator InMails, 200-plus profile views a day. The extra USD 20 a seat buys multi-team management, advanced LinkedIn protection, lead tagging, step analytics and evergreen leads. A/B testing is listed there too, but the FAQ on the same page says Pro has it, so check that one before it decides your tier. A single recruiter who will not use the rest is paying for a badge marked most popular.
Email credits do not roll over
100 a month, renewed and not carried forward. A recruiter who works in bursts, quiet for three weeks and then building a list, loses the quiet weeks rather than banking them.
One LinkedIn account per seat
Sharing is not a way around the per-seat price, and it should not be: two people working one LinkedIn profile is exactly the pattern that draws attention to an account.
Pricing and buying reality
7-day free trial, then USD 39 to 79 per seat per month billed annually, or USD 59 to 99 monthly
- Basic: USD 59 per user per month, or USD 39 billed annually. 20 connection requests and 30 messages a day, 1 campaign, 100 email-finder credits a month
- Pro: USD 79 per user per month, or USD 59 billed annually. 75-plus connection requests and 100-plus messages a day, unlimited campaigns, 100 email-finder credits a month
- Advanced: USD 99 per user per month, or USD 79 billed annually, marked most popular. Same daily quotas, campaign allowance and email credits as Pro, and it adds multi-team management, advanced LinkedIn protection, lead tagging, step analytics and evergreen leads
- The comparison table also lists A/B testing as an Advanced addition, while the FAQ on the same page says the Pro plan includes it. The vendor has not reconciled the two
- Published daily quotas on Pro and Advanced: 75 connection requests, 100-plus messages, 30 Sales Navigator InMails, 200-plus profile views, 50-plus endorsements, post likes and follows
- Enterprise: custom pricing, with premium onboarding, dedicated technical support and a customer success manager
- 7-day free trial with the Advanced feature set and no credit card required
- Each seat connects one LinkedIn account. All paid plans include both LinkedIn and email sequences
- Email-finder credits renew monthly and are not carried forward
- Integrations named: Make, Zapier, Google and Google Sheets, HubSpot and Salesforce. Prices in USD
What we do not know
- What the Advanced tier carries that Pro does not
- The exact daily ceilings behind the 75-plus and 100-plus figures
- Whether it works with LinkedIn Recruiter, Recruiter Lite or only the basic account
- Where the hosted sessions run and which transfer safeguards apply
Checked on the vendor's pricing page, August 2026. Dripify pricing page, USD prices per user
How it fits your stack
Works with
- HubSpot and Salesforce directly, plus Google Sheets
- Make and Zapier, for anything not on that list
Likely replaces
- Sending connection requests and follow-ups by hand
- Leaving a machine running so a browser-based tool can work
May overlap with
- Waalaxy and Dux-Soup, which automate the same LinkedIn actions
- The sequencing already inside your ATS or sourcing platform
Check before buying
- Whether you accept a third party holding a session on your LinkedIn account
- Whether Basic's single campaign is a real plan for you or a trial with an invoice
- Whether you will use the team and analytics features Advanced adds, since the quotas are the same as Pro
- Which tier actually includes A/B testing, in writing, since the pricing page says both
- How many LinkedIn accounts you need to run, since that is the seat count
Dripify vs alternatives
Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.
Choose Waalaxy if the entry price matters more than hosted execution: from our own use the two are close on features and on risk, and the decision is price and interface preference.
Choose Dux-Soup when you want the cheapest entry into this category and are willing to run it from your own machine.
Stay inside LinkedIn Recruiter if account safety outweighs volume: it is the expensive answer that carries no platform risk.
Dripify head to head
Pairs SourcrLab has looked at as a single buying decision, with the trade-offs written out.
Used Dripify?
Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical โ all useful.
Evidence
- Plan prices on both billing cycles โ checked against a primary source: Dripify pricing page, USD prices per user
- Daily connection request and message limits per tier โ checked against a primary source: Dripify pricing page, USD prices per user
- 100 email-finder credits a month on every tier, not carried forward โ checked against a primary source: Dripify pricing page, USD prices per user
- 7-day free trial on the Advanced feature set, no card โ checked against a primary source: Dripify pricing page, USD prices per user
- One LinkedIn account per seat โ checked against a primary source: Dripify pricing page, USD prices per user
- Integrations with Make, Zapier, Google Sheets, HubSpot and Salesforce โ checked against a primary source: Dripify product site, integrations and safety wording
- Advanced safety algorithms described as keeping automation compliant โ vendor claim, not independently verified: Dripify product site, integrations and safety wording
- Campaign management and drip sequences in daily use โ first-hand use: Pieter has run campaigns in Dripify and compared it against Waalaxy
- Cloud execution runs without the browser open โ first-hand use: Pieter has run campaigns in Dripify and compared it against Waalaxy
- Advanced adds multi-team management, advanced LinkedIn protection, lead tagging, step analytics and evergreen leads โ checked against a primary source: Dripify pricing page, USD prices per user
- Which tier includes A/B testing, since the comparison and the FAQ disagree โ not enough evidence
- Compatibility with LinkedIn Recruiter or Recruiter Lite โ not enough evidence
- Hosting location and transfer safeguards โ not enough evidence
Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information
Work at Dripify?
Email us to verify this profile or suggest a factual update.