AI recruiting platform: sourcing, screening, sequencing and interviewing
ResearchedArbi
Arbi is Neuroscale AI's recruiting platform, sold as a replacement for a whole stack rather than a layer on one: it searches 900M+ enriched profiles in plain English, scores candidates against explicit written criteria and cites the evidence for each decision, runs multi-channel sequences that stop on reply, and conducts asynchronous AI interviews with the recording, transcript and evidence attached. Four plans, priced per seat and metered in credits.
The short answer
- Best for
- A talent function under real scrutiny — regulated, federal, or simply asked to justify decisions — that wants sourcing, screening, outreach and first-round interviews in one system where every step cites its evidence
- Not ideal for
- Buyers who need a published price before a conversation, and teams unwilling to replace working point tools with one vendor's whole stack
- Price
- Four plans priced per seat and metered in credits; no figures published
- Closest alternative
- HeroHunt.aiThe comparable agent-driven sourcing and outreach platform, when you want the autonomous end of the workflow without also moving screening and interviewing to the same vendor.
At a glance
- Recruitment fitStrong
- Ease of useUnknown
- ImplementationFair
- Price transparencyFair
- Value for moneyUnknown
- ScalabilityFair
Why these assessments
- Recruitment fitStrong
- The four modules are recruitment stages, not generic AI capabilities: sourcing, screening, sequencing and interviewing, each described in terms of what a recruiter does at that stage. Nothing here is a general assistant pointed at hiring.
- Ease of useUnknown
- SourcrLab has not used it. On a product this wide, ease is whether a recruiter trusts the screening enough to act on it, and that is answered by running real roles rather than by reading a feature list.
- ImplementationFair
- 50-plus ATS and email integrations mean it can sit beside a system of record rather than requiring a migration, and the vendor publishes machine-readable developer resources. But a product sold as replacing a whole stack is an adoption project by design, and Enterprise onboarding is described as white-glove, which is not the shape of a light rollout.
- Price transparencyFair
- The model is published in unusual detail and the numbers are not: four named plans, priced per seat and metered in credits, with credits consumed by contact reveals, real-time signal runs and branded exports while searching, screening and replying are free. Knowing what meters is genuinely useful; without a rate you still cannot budget.
- Value for moneyUnknown
- Not assessable. No rate is published for either half of the model, and the value of a stack replacement depends entirely on how many subscriptions it actually retires — a number specific to your stack, not to the product.
- ScalabilityFair
- Per-seat plus credits scales predictably in principle, and the ladder runs from Solo to Enterprise with SSO and SCIM at the top. Without published rates, how the credit half behaves at volume — which is the half that tracks sourcing activity — cannot be stated.
Our reading of the evidence on this page. No score, no formula.
Where it sits
- Discover
- Contact
- Outreach
- Screen
- Interview
The SourcrLab bottom line
An unusually complete AI recruiting platform with one clear organising principle. Four modules: Sourcing searches 900M+ enriched profiles in plain English and returns verified contact details; Screening scores every candidate in a stage against explicit written criteria and cites the evidence; Sequencing runs multi-step, multi-channel outreach that threads follow-ups and stops on reply; Interviewing conducts asynchronous AI interviews and returns scored results with the recording, transcript and evidence attached. It connects to 50-plus ATS and email systems, and publishes machine-readable developer resources including an OpenAPI 3.1 spec. The company spent two years building the technology for US government customers, including a Department of Defense SBIR Phase II contract, before the commercial launch in July 2026, and names NVIDIA, Deloitte, Samsung, Palantir and the US Air Force as teams using it — those are the vendor's customer claims, not confirmations from the organisations named. Pricing is four plans, per seat plus credits, with no figures published. Enterprise adds SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reporting and white-glove onboarding.
Best fit
A team that has to be able to say why. Arbi's organising idea is that a screening decision should carry its reasons: it scores every candidate in a stage against explicit written criteria and cites the evidence behind each advance or rejection, and its AI interviews come back with the recording, the transcript and the evidence attached. For a talent function that gets asked to justify a shortlist — by a regulator, a hiring manager, or a candidate — that is a materially different product from one that returns a number.
Think twice if
Two things need settling before a serious evaluation. There is no published price: the model is described in detail — four plans, per seat, metered in credits, with contact reveals, signal runs and branded exports consuming them while searching, screening and replying do not — but no rate appears anywhere, so the credit half of the bill is unmodellable until someone quotes it. And read the security line precisely: Enterprise is described as including SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reporting. Reporting available at a tier is not the same claim as the company holding either certification, and if your procurement needs the certificate rather than a report, ask for the certificate.
SourcrLab assessment
Everything on this page comes from the vendor's own pages, checked on the dates below. SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work, so you will not find a first-hand opinion here.
Why choose Arbi?
Every decision carries its evidence
Screening scores candidates against explicit written criteria and cites the evidence behind each advance or rejection. That is the difference between a shortlist you can defend and a shortlist you have to trust, and it is the reason to look at this rather than at a cheaper scoring tool.
The credit meter is pointed at the right things
Credits are consumed by contact reveals, real-time signal runs and branded exports, while searching, screening and replying are free. That is a sensibly drawn line: the actions with a real marginal cost are metered and the daily work is not, so a recruiter is not rationing the thinking part of the job.
Four stages in one system, connected to the one you keep
Sourcing, screening, sequencing and interviewing normally mean four subscriptions and three export-import steps. Arbi covers all four and still connects to 50-plus ATS and email systems, so the system of record does not have to move for the workflow to consolidate.
Developer surface is published, not promised
An OpenAPI 3.1 specification and machine-readable resources are available rather than described as coming. For a team that intends to drive the platform from its own tooling, a spec you can read today is worth more than a roadmap entry.
Main trade-offs
The model is published; the prices are not
Four plans — Solo, Growth, Business, Enterprise — priced per seat and metered in credits, with what consumes a credit spelled out. No rate appears for either half. Knowing the shape of a bill is genuinely more than most vendors offer and it still leaves a buyer unable to compare this to anything without a sales conversation.
Reporting at a tier is not a certification
Enterprise is described as including SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reporting alongside SSO and SCIM. Read that as written: it says reporting is available at that tier, which is a different claim from the company holding either certification, and it implies the lower tiers do not carry it. If procurement needs the certificate itself, ask for the certificate and its scope rather than accepting the tier description.
The named customers are the vendor's claim
NVIDIA, Deloitte, Samsung, Palantir and the US Air Force are listed as teams using Arbi. Those are the vendor's statements about its own customers, not confirmations from the organisations named, and a logo tells a buyer nothing about which module a team uses or at what scale. Ask for a reference in your own segment instead.
Replacing a stack is a decision, not a purchase
The product is positioned as replacing your entire recruiting stack, and a platform that spans sourcing, screening, sequencing and interviewing makes four claims a specialist tool makes one of. Consolidation is real value when the modules hold; it is concentrated risk when one of them does not. Test the two your process actually depends on before retiring anything.
A young commercial product with a specific heritage
The technology was built over two years for US government customers, including a Department of Defense SBIR Phase II contract, and opened commercially in July 2026. That heritage explains the emphasis on written criteria and cited evidence, and it also means the commercial track record is months rather than years, and shaped by a buyer whose requirements are not a European employer's.
Pricing and buying reality
Four plans, per seat plus credits; no figures published
- Four Arbi plans: Solo, Growth, Business and Enterprise
- Plans are priced per seat and metered in credits
- Credits are consumed by contact detail reveals, real-time signal runs and branded exports
- Searching, screening and replying do not consume credits
- Enterprise is priced by application and adds SSO and SCIM, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reporting, and white-glove onboarding
- No numeric rate is published for the seat price or for a credit
What we do not know
- The seat price on each of the four plans
- What a credit costs, how many each plan includes and what an overage costs
- Contract term, minimum seats and any annual commitment
- Whether SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications are held by the company, as distinct from reporting being available at the Enterprise tier
- Data-residency options for European candidate data
Checked August 2026. We do not list a price we have not verified ourselves. Arbi pricing page (four named plans, the per-seat-plus-credits model, what does and does not consume a credit, and the Enterprise tier's SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reporting and white-glove onboarding). No numeric rate is published for either the seat price or a credit
How it fits your stack
Works with
- 50-plus ATS and email integrations, so the system of record can stay where it is
- Your own tooling, through a published OpenAPI 3.1 specification and machine-readable resources
Likely replaces
- A separate sourcing tool with its own candidate database and contact reveals
- A separate outreach sequencer for multi-channel follow-up
- A separate asynchronous video or AI interview product for first-round screening
- Manual scoring of a stage against criteria kept in a document
May overlap with
- Agent-driven sourcing and outreach platforms that run the outbound cycle themselves
- The AI screening and interview modules an enterprise ATS may already include
Check before buying
- The seat price, the credit rate and what each plan includes, in writing
- Whether the company holds SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications, and their scope, rather than reporting being available at a tier
- Whether your exact ATS is one of the 50-plus integrations, and which fields sync in each direction
- The screening quality on twenty candidates you already know well, and whether the cited evidence actually supports the score
- Where European candidate data is processed and stored, and on what legal basis, given the product's US federal origins
Arbi vs alternatives
Products a buyer would genuinely put next to this one, with the reason you would pick each instead.
Choose HeroHunt.ai when you want the agent-driven sourcing and outreach half without moving screening and interviewing to the same vendor.
Choose SourceGeek when you would rather have one AI layer reading and writing across the tools you already run than replace them, and published per-seat pricing matters.
Consider SeekOut when breadth of profile data and search filters is the real requirement, rather than an evidence trail behind every screening decision.
Used Arbi?
Tell other recruiters what worked, what did not, and who it suits. Positive, mixed or critical — all useful.
Evidence
- Four modules: Sourcing across 900M+ enriched profiles searched in plain English with verified contact details, Screening that scores candidates in a stage against explicit written criteria and cites the evidence, Sequencing with multi-step multi-channel outreach that threads follow-ups and stops on reply, and asynchronous AI Interviewing returning scored results with recording, transcript and evidence — checked against a primary source: Arbi product site (the four modules and what each does, the 900M+ profile claim, evidence citation on screening decisions, 50-plus ATS and email integrations, machine-readable developer resources, and the named customer logos)
- 50-plus ATS and email integrations, with machine-readable developer resources including an OpenAPI 3.1 specification — checked against a primary source: Arbi product site (the four modules and what each does, the 900M+ profile claim, evidence citation on screening decisions, 50-plus ATS and email integrations, machine-readable developer resources, and the named customer logos)
- Four plans — Solo, Growth, Business and Enterprise — priced per seat and metered in credits, where credits are consumed by contact reveals, real-time signal runs and branded exports while searching, screening and replying are free — checked against a primary source: Arbi pricing page (four named plans, the per-seat-plus-credits model, what does and does not consume a credit, and the Enterprise tier's SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reporting and white-glove onboarding). No numeric rate is published for either the seat price or a credit
- Enterprise is priced by application and includes SSO and SCIM, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reporting, and white-glove onboarding — reporting available at a tier, which is not a statement that the company holds either certification — checked against a primary source: Arbi pricing page (four named plans, the per-seat-plus-credits model, what does and does not consume a credit, and the Enterprise tier's SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reporting and white-glove onboarding). No numeric rate is published for either the seat price or a credit
- Teams at NVIDIA, Deloitte, Samsung, Palantir and the US Air Force are named as users — the vendor's claims about its own customers, not confirmations from those organisations — vendor claim, not independently verified: Arbi product site (the four modules and what each does, the 900M+ profile claim, evidence citation on screening decisions, 50-plus ATS and email integrations, machine-readable developer resources, and the named customer logos)
- The technology was developed over two years for US government customers, including an April 2025 Department of Defense SBIR Phase II contract, with commercial launch in July 2026 — vendor claim, not independently verified: Commercial launch announcement, 7 July 2026, and coverage of the April 2025 Department of Defense SBIR Phase II contract that preceded it — a vendor-issued release carried by newswires, so the company history is the vendor's account
- The seat price, the credit rate and what each plan includes — not enough evidence
- Whether SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications are held by the company, and data-residency options for European candidate data — not enough evidence
- SourcrLab has not used this product in real recruitment work. — not enough evidence
Last reviewed: August 2026. How SourcrLab verifies information
Work at Arbi?
Verify this profile or suggest a factual update. Free.