Skip to content
SourcrLab
All comparisons
Sterling logo

Sterling

50/100

Enterprise background screening and identity verification. Drug testing, criminal checks, and employment verification.

VS
Plum logo

Plum

42/100

Industrial-organizational psychology assessments for hiring. Measures innovation, communication, teamwork, and adaptability.

Sterling vs Plum

Our verdict. Which one wins?

Best overall
Sterling
Rating 5.6/5
Best value
Plum
Best for specialized needs
Plum
High-volume teams

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureSterlingPlum
PricingPricing on requestPricing on request
Free PlanNoNo
Free TrialNoNo
Key Features
  • AI resume screening
  • Skills assessments
  • Automated scoring
  • Video analysis
  • Bias reduction
  • Custom criteria
  • AI resume screening
  • Skills assessments
  • Automated scoring
  • Video analysis
  • Bias reduction
  • Custom criteria
Best For
  • High-volume teams
  • Enterprise HR
  • Technical hiring
  • High-volume teams
  • Enterprise HR
  • Technical hiring
Pros
  • Screens candidates in a fraction of the traditional time
  • More objective
  • Scales to volume
  • Uniform criteria make hiring decisions more defensible
  • Screens candidates in a fraction of the traditional time
  • More objective evaluation
  • Scales to high volume
  • Uniform criteria make hiring decisions more defensible
Cons
  • AI recommendations need regular bias auditing
  • AI is only as unbiased as its training data
  • Balance automation with genuine human interaction
  • AI recommendations need regular bias auditing
  • Non-traditional candidates may be underscored by the model
  • Balance automation with genuine human interaction

Plum. Pricing Details

Paid

Visit SterlingVisit Plum

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections