SourcrLab
All comparisons
Sterling logo

Sterling

Enterprise background screening and identity verification. Drug testing, criminal checks, and employment verification.

VS
Applied logo

Applied

Bias-reducing recruitment platform using blind reviewing, work sample tests, and structured scoring for fairer hiring.

Sterling vs Applied

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureSterlingApplied
PricingN/AN/A(Starting from $200/month)
Free PlanNoNo
Free TrialNoNo
Key Features
  • AI resume screening
  • Skills assessments
  • Automated scoring
  • Video analysis
  • Bias reduction
  • Custom criteria
  • Applicant tracking & pipeline management
  • Resume parsing & storage
  • Interview scheduling
  • Collaborative hiring workflows
  • Job board posting & distribution
  • Reporting & analytics dashboard
Best For
  • High-volume teams
  • Enterprise HR
  • Technical hiring
  • Growing companies
  • HR departments
  • Talent acquisition teams
  • Recruiting agencies
Pros
  • Screens candidates in a fraction of the traditional time
  • More objective
  • Scales to volume
  • Uniform criteria make hiring decisions more defensible
  • No more scattered spreadsheets or siloed information
  • Transparent handoffs between sourcers, recruiters, and HMs
  • Workflow automation shaves days off each open role
  • Consistent quality across all candidate-facing touchpoints
Cons
  • AI recommendations need regular bias auditing
  • AI is only as unbiased as its training data
  • Balance automation with genuine human interaction
  • Expect 2-4 weeks for full migration and team training
  • Costs grow quickly as you add users or seats
  • Core workflows may require paid add-ons

AppliedPricing Details

Paid - Starting at $200/month

Visit SterlingVisit Applied

Explore Related Comparisons & Collections